The Persians and Bactrians fought to a stand-still, with neither side gaining the upper hand in the conflict. However, the Bactrians respected Cyrus and pledged their loyalty to him, thus becoming a very important satrapy of the Achaemenid Empire. The powerful Bactrian satrapy would act as the muscle of the empire in Central Asia, quelling rebellion in Margiana (4) and providing skilled workers, soldiers, and precious items and minerals as tribute to the Achaemenid kings. The Bactrian satraps generally seemed to be junior princes of the royal household, and these princes commanded the loyalty of the Bactrian people, even throwing them into dynastic struggle on more than one occasion. "It seems, therefore, that Bactria, as the political mainstay of the Achaemenids in Central Asia, was frequently the apange of princes of the blood. This was, however, a policy which cut both ways, since the Bactrians were always willing to give armed support to the claims to the throne of their satrap who was, to some extent, their 'suzerain'. Nevertheless, the Achaemenid rulers found this policy successful since their younger brothers could find an outlet for their frustrations..." (5).
This brief, essential summary of Bactrian contributions to the Achaemenids brings us up to through the Achaemenid era, and next we'll venture into the Hellenistic Era, wherein the Greeks leave their mark upon the rich landscape of the Bactrian region.
Citations:
1. Grenet, Franz. Bactria. Encyclopedia Iranica. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/bactria. August 19, 2011. accessed February 1, 2012.
2. Francroft, Henri- Paul. The Cambridge Ancient History vol. 4: Persia, Greece, and the Western Mediterranean. ed. John Boardman, N.G.L Hammond, D.M Lewis, M. Ostwald. University of Cambridge: Cambridge. 1988. pg. 169
3. Ibid.
4. Ibid. pg. 171-172
5. Ibid. pg. 174

No comments:
Post a Comment